The Credit Crunch - Can We Predict the Future

Since before the late 19th century we have beenand believe that they do still have some degree
struggling to understand Economics in such a wayof control over the economy.
that like other sciences we can make predictionsThe consequence of this difference of
about what will happen when we apply a particularunderstanding is that economists continue to
stimulus.throw Billions of public money at their problems
Countless higher degrees and PHD's have beenwhile weather forecasters are content to make
awarded as we honed our collective understandingthe short term forecasts that their understanding
of economic cause and effect, but over aof chaos shows them is the best that they can
century since the beginning of the study ofexpect.
economics we have still not been able to come upBecause the economy was in a state of stable
with a definitive model that describes how ourgrowth for so long the perception appears to
economy works.have become that this was the natural state of
This is nothing to be ashamed of.affairs and would continue for the foreseeable
We have been studying the weather for a lotfuture. People working in the financial sector
longer than our economy and have only recentlytherefore traded on the expectation that this
come to the conclusion that the processes thatexpansion would continue forever and therefore
produce weather are chaotic. This means thatlost their ability to continue to trade when the
while we may understand the physical processesother half of the cycle, recession, occurred.
that produce weather we do not have the abilityTheir business's became tuned more and more
to make predictions because the complexity offinely to the conditions of a growth market and
the weather generation processes defieswere no longer able to cope when the conditions
prediction. In the same way it would appear thatof that market changed.
the economy, while we have a broadWe can see the effect more dramatically if we
understanding of cause and effect, because of itsuse the world of formula one racing for an
chaotic nature, also defies prediction.analogy. We have F1 cars that have been
What we are seeing now in the aftermath of thedeveloped to run in a specific environment, the F1
Credit Crunch are attempts to influence therace track, but outside of that environment they
economy by governments who are ploughing inare completely useless. Take an F1 car down the
Billions, of pounds or dollars, into systems to tryhigh street and you will see what I mean. There is
to stimulate them without any clear understandingno room in the car for shopping, the traffic
of the effect that their efforts at stimulation willcalming measures would tear the aerodynamic
have.features off, a single raised drain cover would rip
It is like watching someone trying to start a carthe bottom out of the engine, the car would
by kicking the tyres.overheat by going too slow and it would not be
In the sixties we were given two types ofable to turn corners. In this situation would you
weather forecast, the short range forecast, forspend more money to change the F1 car to try
the coming week, and the long range forecast,to make it cope with the high street conditions, or
for the next quarter. When the UK meteorologicalwould you recognise that the design was
office in Bracknell got two super computers tofundamentally unsuitable, throw it away and start
make more accurate forecasts, the first thingagain?
that the computers told the forecasters was toIn the economy we are facing a situation where
stop making long range forecasts because theour financial and other institutions have tuned their
results were no better than chance.operations for a specific set of market conditions,
History may be trying to tell us that our attemptsgrowth. They have now shown that they are
to stimulate the economy have just as muchunable to cope with a different set of market
chance of success as forecasters had atconditions, recession.
predicting the long range weather.We have two choices. We can continue to throw
The economy, as does the weather, goes inmoney at the problem in the vague hope that it
cycles. In the seventies we were sure we weremight do some good, or we can we admit that
seeing the beginning of a new ice age and todaytheses institutions have evolved to service a
we are predicting global warming with no lessspecific market and are now no longer viable
certainty. For the last fifteen years we have beenwhen those market conditions change.
experiencing steady growth in the globalIf the latter do we, like the F1 car, keep patching
economy, and today we are in recession.it up with expensive solutions that don't really
The difference between the weather and thesolve the problem, or do we allow them to fail
economy is that we never thought that we couldand replace them with something more robust.
control the weather so it was quite easy to admitWhat would be the cost of allowing the institutions
that we could not predict it beyond the three daywho have evolved in this way to fail? Would it be
forecasting service we currently enjoy.more than the money that is currently being
Economists have not yet reached that epipha nyspent to try to save them?