| I can play the ponies at Saratoga, Aqueduct and | | | | racing systems. Now that I have them I can go |
| Belmont. I can also play the ponies at Calder, | | | | to any type of track and not worry about having |
| CharlesTown and Mountaineer. I can also play the | | | | in-depth knowledge of that particular track such |
| ponies at Delta Downs, Beaulah Park and Suffolk | | | | as top jockeys, fastest time(s) of the |
| Downs. | | | | assortment of races, trainer percentages, dirt or |
| What's my point? Any racetrack, no matter what | | | | poly track surface, stretch run variants, etc. |
| the condition (or uncondition) it's still provides an | | | | Horse players gamble at any type of track which |
| opportunity to prosper and make money! It's all | | | | is why it is important to have an edge. Your |
| about making money, right? If Ben Hur was 4-5 | | | | handicapping knowledge is one type of advantage |
| odds, you would put him in your triple wager, | | | | but when your betting at unchartered "territories" |
| right? | | | | it's good to have the racing system(s) advantage. |
| Us horse players know what it's like when your at | | | | It is surprising to admit that alot of horse racing |
| the track and your not doing so well, you may | | | | systems work better at the minor race track |
| turn to the simulcast wagering to try to change | | | | circuits more often, as opposed to the major |
| your "luck". Hey why not, sometimes we pick | | | | outlets such as Saratoga, Belmont, Santa Anita |
| winners at these "other" tracks and sometimes | | | | and the like. In fact, I prefer to apply my |
| the races may be easier to handicap as well. | | | | gambling strategy at a course where each race is |
| Maybe we don't include many statistical factors | | | | usually and continuously filled with numerous |
| when handicapping a simulcast race. Either way, | | | | longshots in unusually very large fields. As I |
| it's an opportunity to make money...big money. | | | | mentioned earlier, "particular" racing tracks were |
| When I compiled my systems I used all sorts of | | | | not intended when I researched the integrity of |
| tracks to calculate my win percentages and to | | | | each angle. |
| perform the actual testing of the horse racing | | | | At any conditional racetrack, this book |
| system itself. Some of my biggest hits were | | | | "Thoroughbred Horse Racing Systems and |
| from Charlestown and Arlington racetracks. We all | | | | Methodologies" can easily be applied. Both superior |
| play the ponies to make money so why not own | | | | and inferior tracks are welcomed by my book. As |
| some racing systems that can be applicable to all | | | | long as the methodology is applied correctly, you |
| thoroughbred horse racing tracks? My intentions | | | | can find a winner at any track. |
| were to create some high percentage horse | | | | |