Sir Tom Stoppard, the Early Plays - Enter a Free Man

Sir Tom Stoppard, the early plays3. Enter a Freewhen someone disagrees with you on a moral
ManSir Tom Stoppard's play Enter a Free Manpoint you assume that he is one step behind in his
(Originally called A Walk on the Water, made forthinking, and he assumes that he has gone one
TV, 1963) is a more complex play built up on thestep ahead. But I take both parts, O'Hara
simple foundations of A Separate Peace (1960).leapfrogging myself along the great moral issues,
The chief difference is that George Riley of Enterrefuting myself and rebutting the refutation
a Free Man, having a wife and daughter, has atowards a truth that must be the compound of
commitment to a social group. Thus he has nottwo opposite half-truths. And you never reach it
opted out of society to the extent that Brownbecause there is always something more to say.
has, but when he opts out of paid employmentBut I can't ditch it.' (p.53.)Enter a Free Man ends
the issue of the individual's responsibility to otherson a note of compromise and re-establishment of
is more immediate and concrete.Anotherharmony. George and Linda both make failed
important difference is that Riley takes uponattempts to escape the situation by leaving home,
himself an active role, that of inventor, whereasthen understand each other better when they
Brown wanted to do nothing and have nothingreturn. George makes steps towards coming to
expected of him; even his painting was 'only toterms with reality by deciding to go to the labour
please Matron really' (p.14.). Riley has taken on aexchange, and Linda grows more tolerant
responsibility to himself as well as to his family,towards his 'eccentricities'. George's wife has
and therefore he can fail, whereas Brown, in hisalways tolerated his odd behaviour without
passive isolation, was escaping the possibility ofexpecting him to be a success, in fact she
failure. In fact Riley is a failure, both as the headmarried him because he was 'different', and she
of a family and as an inventor and it is this factdefends him as an individual, against Linda's attack
that creates the tension of the play, because iton his social status.'There's lots of people like your
forces us to consider that his actions might befather different. Some make more money
justified in principle even if they fail in practice.Thebecause they're different. And some make none
positive side of George Riley is his independentbecause they're different'. (p.57)'If he was going
creative spirit. He stands for the freedom of the.to be a failure anyway, he was better off failing
individual to use his own mind and follow his ownat something he wanted to succeed at . He got
principles.'I was given a mind and I use it. I don'thold of a bit of enthusiasm. That was worth a lot.'
go through life as if it was a public escalator with(p.59)It is notable in his first two plays Stoppard
nothing to do but watch the swimsuits go by.'gives equal weight to the human relationships and
(p.48)He finds the ordinary routines of lifeto the issue under examination. John Brown and
meaningless and pointless, and he has the courageNurse Maggie strike up an affectionate relationship,
to follow his creative promptings in spite of theand at the end of the play she is as reluctant to
ridicule and indifference of those around him.'Alet him leave the hospital as she was to let him
man must resist. A man must stand apart, makeenter at the beginning. And in Enter a Free Man
a clean break on his own two feet. Faith is themuch time is spent on the home life of the Rileys,
key - faith in oneself.' (p.16)In terms of generalshowing how having the father in a parasitic role
principles his ideas are quite sound; to invent acauses tension and argument between the
product useful in daily life, make a prototype in hismother and daughter.This aspect of the play is
own workshop, then form a partnership to gonot very successful though, Linda and Persephone
into business manufacturing the product. But he isare not convincing characters; their behaviour is
quite out of touch with reality, his inventions'wooden' because Stoppard is more interested in
always have a flaw which he has not foreseen.them as spokespeople for and against George,
His thinking is logical, but at the expense ofthan as characters in their own right. At this early
common sense and practicality. He does notstage in his career Stoppard seems to have
realise that his prospective partner is merelyrealised that his talents did not lend themselves to
making fun of him, and he avoids the guilt hethe portrayal of characters and relationships.The
ought to feel about being financially dependent onsame is true of his novel Lord Malquist and Mr.
his daughter by believing that he will soon beMoon (1966) in which the characters are entirely
worth millions from his inventions. He is living in aflat, being representatives of stereotyped
world of his own.In making George so lacking inlife-styles. The John and Maggie, or George and
self-awareness Stoppard has avoided having hisLinda/Persephone type of relationship, in which a
'hero' face up to his responsibilities, or the guilt hecouple co-exist in a fluctuating state of affection,
ought to feel at their neglect. All the opposition tomisunderstanding and antagonism is recurrent in
George comes from his daughter Linda, whoStoppard's work. It can be found in almost every
points out his inadequacies,'If he was honest he'dplay. But the emotional content of his plays is at
come down and say I've decided that somean absolute minimum, the characters being
people are cut out to make a living and someprimarily vehicles for the exploration of an issue.
people are cut out to lie in bed, and I'm the bedThere is often room, however, for an actor to
type.' (p.60.)This splitting up of the issue into twocreate a convincing character to fit Stoppard's
characters, one 'for' and one 'against' isscript; Michael Horden's portrayal of George in
characteristic of Stoppard's technique. He has saidJumpers at the National Theatre being a good
that he writes plays as a means of contradictingexample.Read the full version of this essay at:
himself, (see Bigsby: Tom Stoppard: Writers andMackean runs the site which features a
Their Work p.24), and his plays are oftensubstantial collection of English Literature
structured around the kind of dialectic processResources and Essays, and where his sites on
expressed by Moon in Stoppard's novel MalquistBooks Made Into Movies, and Short Story Writing
and Mr. Moon (1966):'I distrust attitudes, he wentcan also be found. He is the editor of The
on, because they claim to have appropriated theEssentials of Literature in English post-1914,
whole truth and pose as absolutes. And I distrustpublished by Hodder Arnold.
the opposite attitude for the same reason . . .